Uncontrolled quantiative nullpropriation: a quasi-experiment and duplicate submission

<p>APPENDIX</p> <p>“Without experimental control, two (2) independent sample units may have been unilaterally nullpropriated for inutile loitering: a 17-page article (Fahy 1971) and numbered Acts and Scenes—irrespective of dependent contents (Stein 1922).”</p> <p>Nullpropriation haphazardly under-determines samples from anthropogenic perturbations, leaving such samples unmodified for invariant inutile loitering. Under-determination via nullpropriation performs the paradoxical unbinding of samples from anthropogenic perturbation conditions, albeit without modifying the sample and thereby retaining its ‘perturbed’ phase (i.e. complementarity). Thus, unbinding may establish the relative autonomy of sample and perturbation without mixture, each under-determined from empirical or qualitative decision and modification (Clendinnen 1989; Given 2008; Laruelle 2012). Refraining from such modification or decision without variance, nullpropriation uselessly and purposelessly loiters with samples, yielding no accountable effectivity or value.</p> <p>“Fiction” (Schmid 2003, 2012) and “nondemonic intrusion” (Hurlbert 1984) may have been tentatively articulated to nullpropriation.</p> <p>As “unknown, future” objects (quasi- nonclassical quantum phenomena; unobservable waves), “no longer ‘manipulable’” in a “phenomenological sense” (Schmid 2012, p. 138), fictions may non-positivistically extend epistemological frameworks (without altering their foundation) in order to research these frameworks with “exterior elements”.</p> <p>Nullpropriation, which haphazardly under-determines and inutilely loiters samples without modification, remained an independent nondemonic intrusion for the present study (Hurlbert 1984). A nondemonic intrusion is a random and uncontrolled noise variable—e.g. a potential pest, “annoyance”, or that which generally confounds results of treatment or measurement—the effects of which are usually immeasurably slight and primarily unpredictable, but may add noise to data. Hurlbert also notes: “If an event impinges on all experimental units of all treatments there is no problem” and that “some chance events may be detected, but most will not be” (p. 192). By way of nondemonic intrusion, nullpropriation may therefore satisfy the criterion of a quasi-experimentally uncontrolled and non-dependent benign noise variable, insofar as randomization of nullpropriation was also unused and samples were forecasted to be left unmodified (Cohen 1995; Schwab 1999). Non-dependence of nullpropriation may be due to dissociation from the samples (or factors) uselessly under-determined in this ‘study’ from Gauss PDF.</p> <p>However, I may have made such claims jokingly since I already gave up logos and decision (cf. Rovelli 1998). I ‘and’ extant stand-up comedy may cursorily subsist without ontological predication (consistency) in this case. Unrelatedly, I don’t talk about or do anything. I’m not trying to be ironic, and I say this somewhat in anticipation of irony due to incessant auto-paranoia (by whom? according to what system?) (Colby 1975). Gauss PDF quizzed (Daly 2012) the present document without any verifiable motivation or even kinesia. The quizzed document, or non-conceptual matter (cloned materialist Decision; Brassier 2001), behaved via abulia or akinetic mutism (Al-Adawi, Dawe, and Al-Hussaini 2000). Both maybe were psychologically-reduced vectors with unspecified directionality or something. Abiography of Tonya St. Clair.</p> <p>Once nullpropriated, samples may remain under-determined from the spatiotemporal or causal conditions from which they came, in order to perform independent of such conditions. However, insofar as nullpropriation performs without modification or imposed variance, conditions of samples might continue to persist unweathered by inutile loitering.—An ‘aside’ (or citation style): one may pursue the artificial meteorology of nullpropriation to investigate (unobservable?) issues of nullpropriative weathering, atmosphere, seasonality, volatility, etc. without deferral.</p> <p>Insofar as reproducibility of experiments is one of the “main principles of the scientific method” (“Reproducibility” 2012), nullpropriation may have indirectly quizzed reproducibility via leaving samples unmodified.</p> <p>On 10-June 2012 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, an uncontrolled quasi-experiment (Cook and Campbell 1979; Achen 1986) indirectly observed by Gauss PDF may have played via nondemonic, unilateral nullpropriation of two (2) independent samples: a 17-page article from Fahy (1971) and 182 replicates of numbered Acts and 71 replicates of numbered Scenes (separate from respective contents i.e. dialogue, directions, etc.) from Stein (1922). Once indirectly observed, Gauss PDF inferred from the above description that nullpropriation may have loitered the article to under-determine X from the anthropogenic perturbation conditions decided by Fahy. Nullpropriation may have loitered numbered Acts and Scenes to under-determine X from the anthropogenic perturbation conditions decided by Stein.</p> <p>Digital Portable Document Files (PDFs) of each sample were assessed prior to nullpropriation. “Some Factors in the Ecology and Dispersal of Lepinotus patruelis Pearman (Psocoptera), a Pest of Stored Products”, a 1.1 MB (17 pp.) PDF, was published in 1971 by Journal of Stored Products Research in Oxford, UK and retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022474X7190018X (Fig. 1). Geography and Plays, a 5 MB (425 pp.) PDF, was published in 1922 by Four Seas Company in Boston, MA and retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=OVNbAAAAMAAJ (Fig. 2).</p> <p>Effects of nullpropriation could not be shown. Nothing happened (droneriot 2010).</p> <p>REFERENCES</p> <p>Achen, C. H. (1986). The Statistical Analysis of Quasi-Experiments. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.</p> <p>Al-Adawi, S., Dawe, G.S., Al-Hussaini, A. (2000). Aboulia: Neurobehavioral dysfunction of dopaminergic system? Medical Hypotheses 54, 523-530.</p> <p>Brassier, R. (2001). Alien Theory: The Decline of Materialism in the Name of Matter. Retrieved from http://www.cinestatic.com/trans-mat/index.htm</p> <p>Clendinnen, J. F. (1989). Realism and the Underdetermination of Theory. Synthese 81: 63-90.</p> <p>Cohen, P. R. (1996). Empirical Methods for Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.</p> <p>Cook, T. D. and D. T. Campbell. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.</p> <p>Daly, K. (2012b). Idempotent quizzing of numbered Acts and Scenes?. Retrieved from http://nonmusicology.com/2011/01/idempotent-quizzing-of-numbered-acts.html</p> <p>droneriot. (2010, January 17). [Review of Landscapes]. Encyclopaedia Metallum. Retrieved from http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/Ildjarn/Landscapes/10350/droneriot</p> <p>Fahy, E. D. (1971). Some Factors in the Ecology and Dispersal of Lepinotus patruelis Pearman (Psocoptera), a Pest of Stored Products. J. Stored Prod. Res., 7: 107-123.</p> <p>Given, L. (Ed.) (2008). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oak, CA: SAGE Publications.</p> <p>Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54: 187–211.</p> <p>Laruelle, F. (2012). Photo-Fiction, a Non-Standard Aesthetics. (D. S. Burk, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: Univocal Publishing.</p> <p>Reproducibility. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved June 10, 2012 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reproducibility</p> <p>Rovelli, C. (1998). “Incerto Tempore, Incertisque Loci”: Can we compute the exact time at which a quantum measurement happens? Foundations of Physics 28: 1031-1043.</p> <p>Schmid, A.F. (2003). Hypothesis of Non-Epistemology. Non-Philosophy Now: Theory and Practice. Event conducted from Middlesex University, London.</p> <p>Schmid, A-F. (2012). The Science-Thought of Laruelle and its Effects on Epistemology. In J. Mullarkey and A. P. Smith. (Eds.). Laruelle and Non-Philosophy (pp. 122-142). Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.</p> <p>Schwab, D. P. (1999). Research Methods for Organizational Methods. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.</p> <p>Stein, G. (1922). Geography and Plays. Boston, MA: The Four Seas Company.</p>